void probability
Near-optimal Sensor Placement for Detecting Stochastic Target Trajectories in Barrier Coverage Systems
Kim, Mingyu, Stilwell, Daniel J., Yetkin, Harun, Jimenez, Jorge
--This paper addresses the deployment of sensors for a 2-D barrier coverage system. The challenge is to compute near-optimal sensor placements for detecting targets whose trajectories follow a log-Gaussian Cox line process. We explore sensor deployment in a transformed space, where linear target trajectories are represented as points. T o illustrate our approach, we focus on positioning sensors of the barrier coverage system on the seafloor to detect passing ships. Through numerical experiments using historical ship data, we compute sensor locations that maximize the probability all ship passing over the barrier coverage system are detected. I NTRODUCTION Barrier coverage systems have been widely studied in various multi-agent system applications, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UA Vs) and sensor networks. In these scenarios, devices are deployed to create a coverage area that detects targets within a specified region.
- North America > United States > Virginia > Hampton (0.04)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Prince George's County > Laurel (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Shikoku > Ehime Prefecture > Matsuyama (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Energy (0.68)
- Health & Medicine (0.47)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.46)
Improved Approximation of Sensor Network Performance for Seabed Acoustic Sensors
Kim, Mingyu, Stilwell, Daniel J., Yetkin, Harun, Jimenez, Jorge
Sensor locations to detect Poisson-distributed targets, such as seabed sensors that detect shipping traffic, can be selected to maximize the so-called void probability, which is the probability of detecting all targets. Because evaluation of void probability is computationally expensive, we propose a new approximation of void probability that can greatly reduce the computational cost of selecting locations for a network of sensors. We build upon prior work that approximates void probability using Jensen's inequality. Our new approach better accommodates uncertainty in the (Poisson) target model and yields a sharper error bound. The proposed method is evaluated using historical ship traffic data from the Hampton Roads Channel, Virginia, demonstrating a reduction in the approximation error compared to the previous approach. The results validate the effectiveness of the improved approximation for maritime surveillance applications.
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.25)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Prince George's County > Laurel (0.04)
- North America > Greenland (0.04)
- Atlantic Ocean > North Atlantic Ocean > Greenland Sea (0.04)
- Government > Military (0.49)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.47)
Toward optimal placement of spatial sensors
Kim, Mingyu, Yetkin, Harun, Stilwell, Daniel J., Jimenez, Jorge, Shrestha, Saurav, Stark, Nina
This paper addresses the challenges of optimally placing a finite number of sensors to detect Poisson-distributed targets in a bounded domain. We seek to rigorously account for uncertainty in the target arrival model throughout the problem. Sensor locations are selected to maximize the probability that no targets are missed. While this objective function is well-suited to applications where failure to detect targets is highly undesirable, it does not lead to a computationally efficient optimization problem. We propose an approximation of the objective function that is non-negative, submodular, and monotone and for which greedy selection of sensor locations works well. We also characterize the gap between the desired objective function and our approximation. For numerical illustrations, we consider the case of the detection of ship traffic using sensors mounted on the seafloor.
- North America > United States > Virginia > Montgomery County > Blacksburg (0.04)
- North America > United States > Florida > Bay County > Panama City (0.04)
- North America > Greenland (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Energy (0.47)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.46)